Establishing Compliant Small Business Systems For Federal Government Services Contracts

INTRODUCTION

To effectively market a federal government services contract a small business must sell on the basis of having a business system as well as technical performance infrastructure ready to run the job when a contract proposal is submitted. This dual requirement is where many small businesses fall short in their federal government contract start up planning.

Parallel thinking is required to plan for government project technical effort against a template of necessary business process infrastructure, driven by introducing Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) into the company. Key elements of the necessary business system infrastructure are discussed in this article which assumes that your are in the federal government services contracting business, that you plan to price your services at an hourly rate and sell them by labor categories with professional job descriptions to perform the government's statement of work and bill by the hour. This article also assumes that you are not contracting under FAR Part 12, "Commercial Contracting".

Labor Categories

Each skill set in the company must be specified and defined as chargeable directly to a contract, or indirectly to a cost center overhead, a material handling pool or a general and administrative pool. Each labor category must have a job description and a prospective salary range for proposal purposes.

Cost Center

A Cost Center is a single business entity within the company, organized for a group of business lines and clients with close similarities for technical and business management purposes. Cost centers are also driven by geographic location and the requirement to separate commercial from federal government business. Projects performed in government facilities may also require a separate cost center, since many of the associated expenses for such operations are born by the government. Cost centers usually have individual subsidiary ledgers, balance sheets and profit and loss statements and are summarized monthly to a company total. Each cost center must have job cost accounting for the contracts residing there and a cost center unique overhead rate.

Examples:

Commercial Cost Center

Federal Government Cost Center

Government Site Unique Cost Center

Annual Overhead Rate

An overhead pool is made up of individual Cost Center indirect expenses projected for a given year divided by the projected Cost Center direct labor dollars for that year to determine a rate. Typical Cost Center Overhead general ledger expenses are those which cannot be effectively charged direct to contracts. These include Cost Center management, building lease, telephone, fringe benefits, electricity, capital equipment, depreciation, and the like.  An example of a 2026 Cost Center Overhead Rate of 110%  is as follows: 

2026 Gen Indirect Exp for Cost Center        =  $459,800

_____________________________________________= 110%
2026  Projected Dir. Labor $ for cost center = $418,000

The estimated annual Cost Center Overhead Rate is applied to direct labor cost estimates to price labor cost through overhead for 2026 for the Cost Center. When a contract is awarded, actual overhead expenses are allocated monthly to direct labor by contract on the basis of direct labor dollars incurred. Projected overhead rates are adjusted based on actual total cost center experience as the year progresses.

Annual Material Handling Rate (if required) - Corporate wide expenses specifically associated with buying, storing and shipping material for a given year divided by the projected direct material dollars projected company-wide for that year. Not all companies have business that is material intensive enough to warrant a separate pool for material handling. Where extensive buying or subcontracting is conducted out of the corporate headquarters and inventory and shipping labor are high, a material handling pool is permitted by the government when it is not administratively possible to charge these expenses directly to contracts.

The estimated annual Corporate Material Handling Rate is applied to direct material cost estimates to price material for all Cost Centers. When a contract is awarded, actual material handling expenses are allocated monthly to direct material by contract on the basis of direct material dollars incurred. The projected material-handling rate is adjusted based on actual total company experience as the year progresses.

Annual General and Administrative Rate (G and A) is corporate indirect expenses projected for a given year divided by the total projected direct cost plus overheads for all cost centers for that year. Typical G and A general ledger expenses include costs which cannot be charged direct to contracts or to cost center overhead expenses such as corporate executive management, headquarters building leases, legal expenses, company wide insurance, corporate advertising, and the like.

MANAGEMENT FACTORS

Success will be determined by managing the numerator in each of the above equations and winning or maintaining the projected direct cost programs in the annual denominator. If expenses increase due to unforeseen events or if the company loses more projects than planned in the annual denominator base, the associated rate will go up for estimating purposes and under cost plus or time and material contracts the rate billed to the government will also increase. 

Existing fixed price contracts under these circumstances will become less profitable. Pricing for future fixed price contracts must reflect the increased rates being experienced to avoid further losses.

Correspondingly, if expenses decrease due to unforeseen events/good management or if the company wins or grows more projects than planned in the annual denominator base, the associated rate will decrease for estimating purposes and under cost plus or time and material contracts the rate billed to the government will also decrease. Existing fixed price contracts will become more profitable. Pricing for future fixed price contracts must reflect the decreased rates being experienced.

For time and material and cost plus contracts, monthly billing rates utilized are "Provisional Rates" that the contractor is free to change based on experience as long as he informs contracting officers and the local Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) of the changes and reasons for the changes can be demonstrated. Before time and material and cost plus contracts can be closed out, provisional rates must be adjusted to reflect actual rates experienced. 

The contractor will owe the government if provisional billings have been higher than actual cost history. Correspondingly, if the actual rates for cost plus or time and materials contracts have been higher than the provisional rates billed by the contractor, the government will owe the contractor at closeout. 

Firm, Fixed Price Contracts are generally billed at negotiated fixed prices by line item at contract award and paid upon final delivery and acceptance or through monthly progress payments based on incurred cost with a percent of payment retention by the government until deliveries are complete. 

Fixed rate contracts are billed on a monthly basis through hours incurred. The hourly rates are fixed for the contract term and do not change.

COST ESTIMATING/COST ACCOUNTING EXAMPLE

Consider a historical 12-month project priced in a hypothetical small business utilizing forward pricing "Provisional Rates." The contract began in July of 2018 and continued to July of 2019. Direct labor rates were escalated between 2018 and 2019 by 3.5% based on the Consumer Price Index. The company decided to keep the indirect rates for Overhead and G&A the same for pricing purposes in 2018 and 2019. The company had no Material Handling Pool and charged purchasing, inventory and shipping costs direct to contracts.

This government contractor maintained Overhead and G&A rate databases in Excel by month by year to forward price projects such as the one in this example. The databases all utilized the same generic chart of expense accounts as a template for the Cost Center Overhead and G and A monthly expense forecasts (equation numerators). The project was priced in cost center 1 at an overhead rate of 110% and a corporate G and A rate of 10%.

Cost Center Direct Labor forecasts in the databases were projected by hours and salary dollars for each existing and anticipated project and then summarized to determine the equation denominator which when divided into the Cost Center Numerator B, above) yields the Cost Center Overhead forecast by month by year. Direct Labor was then burdened by the projected Cost Center Overhead and added to Material and Travel to yield a total Cost Center business summary through Overhead.

The G and A rate data base summarized total direct labor through overhead, material and travel cost for all cost centers (equation denominator) and divided it into the total corporate G and A expense (equation numerator) The equation result yielded the projected  G and A rate by month by year. All cost center labor through overhead, material and travel were then summarized and burdened through G and A to forecast a total cost projection by Cost Center at "Provisional Overhead and G and A Rates.

A copy of the annual baseline projected rate database was adjusted with actual expense data each month in the numerator after closing. The denominator for the month was also updated with actual existing and new business developments at the cost center level and G&A monthly actual cost at the corporate level. The resulting actual rate experience is then analyzed for trends as the year proceeds and utilized for making potential adjustments in provisional rates. 

When provisional rate changes are necessary, the government was notified in advance and provided with trend information justifying the rate change. Upon approval by the government, the baseline forecast was adjusted and utilized for billing on T&M and Cost Plus Contracts. The adjusted rates were also utilized to price all future projects. DCAA does not audit management decisions. They simply check the math.

Rate databases are usually fully detailed by month for the current year and 1-2 years into the future. Years 3-5 typically have summarized assumptions through use of escalation factors. Bids for out years 5-10 if required by the government definitely utilize escalation factors. Very few government contractors are willing to bid on a firm, fixed price basis beyond out year 5.

To comply with Cost Accounting Standards 401 and 402, this company set up each new government contract on job cost accounting in the identical manner in which it was proposed; in effect identifying direct labor, direct material and other direct costs to each contract monthly and allocating overhead and G&A utilizing the same numerator and denominator relationships upon which the contract was originally estimated.

The larger the direct cost that was incurred on a contract in this company the greater the share of the cost center overhead and corporate G and A was incurred by that contract. 

The entire content of this company's business system was subject to audit and verification by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) against Cost Accounting Standards 401 and 402. 

DCAA validated company records by requiring "Incurred Cost Submissions" from this contractor. The submissions validated final rates for cost plus and time and material contract closeouts. Fixed price contracts were closed out when final delivery was received and accepted.  Retention on monthly progress payments under fixed price contracts was released at closeout.

SUMMARY:

The software tools discussed at the posting at this blog DCAA AUDITS AND SMALL BUSINESS JOB COST ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS are designed to assist you in running the above process from a job cost accounting perspective. However, these tools must be set-up to reflect the unique way you are organized and they must reflect your specific business plans as discussed in this article. They will not do that for you.

Illustrations of the the rates, pricing and the long range plan utilized in the above example are available in Chapters 45 and 51 through 53 of my free book, "Small Business Federal Government Contracting" and appendices A and B. You may download the book and related documents from the "Box Net" Cube in the right margin of this site.

DCAA Service Contract Audits and Small Business Job Cost Accounting Software Tools

INTRODUCTION

Small Businesses typically have a learning experience growing into government services contracting. Part of that process is undergoing reviews by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA). It takes knowledge of the requirements and strategic focus to set up the type of business processes required for accommodating government contract job cost accounting and fit those processes into the way your company does business.

DCAA or other agency representatives do not approve job cost accounting software packages. They approve contractor job cost accounting practices in compliance with Federal Cost Accounting Standards (CAS). If you are a small business, you are probably going to come under modified CAS Coverage that you can read about at the following link:

What is a "Compliant" Federal Government Contracting Small Business System?

Perhaps you have already examined the above background, but I would encourage you to review it again in connection with planning for your business system. Perhaps you have discovered that CAS compliant job cost accounting effects your estimating structure, your long range planning for indirect rates, as well as your general ledger, overhead and G&A structure. You may have discovered as well that DCAA wants to see your government contracts accounted for in a separate cost center from your commercial work and that there are certain unallowable costs that cannot be charged directly or indirectly to government contracts.

PROPOSAL AUDITS

Proposal audits are performed by DCAA on your cost proposal at the request of the Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO) and verify your direct and indirect rates against your long range plan, your labor category pricing, contingent hire agreements, vendor quotes, subcontractor proposals and all other data related to the cost volume of the proposal. Results go to the PCO. Arithmetic checks are made. No opinion is offered on the merit of the pricing, only that it has been documented in a long-range plan or a vendor or subcontractor quote and it is accurate.

PROGRESS BILLING AUDITS UNDER FIRM, FIXED PRICE CONTRACTS

This type of audit is on live data from your billing system. It is triggered by your submitting a progress payment under a firm, fixed price contract. Progress payments can be allowed in long-running firm, fixed price contracts that are front-end loaded with material and labor investment and have lengthy schedules for delivering the end product.

The DCAA Auditor will get the audit request from the contracting activity and will ask to examine the complete set of job cost records in your accounting system for incurred cost on the fixed price contract and tie those records out to the progress payment requested amount (usually 85-90% of the incurred cost to date - they hold some billed amount in retention). Records audited are at the time card and expense report level, as well as purchase orders, travel vouchers and any other transactions that are booked and billed in your accounting system to the fixed price contract. They will want to see the time cards and other documents and will trace them back through the system.

If you do not have a progress billing clause in your firm, fixed price contract, it is unlikely you will be audited. The contracting activity or the Defense Finance Accounting System (DFAS) will simply compare the final amount you bill to the firm, fixed price amount in your contract and pay if the item or service has been accepted and delivered. (Usually a sign-off by the PCO, Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) or a DD Form 250 signed by a government inspector on product deliveries)

COST PLUS AND TIME AND MATERIAL CONTRACT AUDITS

Billing audits are performed by DCAA, again at the request of the contracting activity. The auditor will go into all actual cost records submitted with your billing. Cost plus and T&M billings must have all the billing detail behind them or they will not be paid. The detail must be at the transaction level and the audit is identical to the one discussed above for progress payments.

INCURRED COST AUDITS (OFTEN REFERRED TO AS "RATE AUDITS")

These audits are conducted when you are closing out contracts with the government and they have been billed at provisional rates, or the government needs to establish that you are billing accurately from a rate standpoint. If the contract is fixed price with progress payments, cost plus or Time and Material in nature and has been billed over a long period, particularly if it has crossed more than one government fiscal year, then a system-wide incurred cost audit will be necessary to verify the rates that were charged to the government and determine the difference between the provisional rate billed and the actual rate incurred (where applicable).

In addition it is periodically necessary for the government to establish that no unallowable costs have found their way into government contract billings.
The government allows provisional billing rates for the convenience of the contractor based on his long-range plan and mix of business. The government holds a retention amount on each billing and then at closeout determines with the contractor through an incurred cost audit the final amount due on the contract, releases the retention accordingly, and the contract can then be closed if all other obligations have been completed. At closeout the government pays the final bill.

A rate audit determines the compliance of the job cost system if it occurs while the contract is in process. If an incurred cost audit occurs on contract closeout actions, results will directly impact final contract billing approval and amounts.

JOB COST ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE TOOLS

My experience with job cost accounting software tools is that complete packages are pretty expensive. COTS accounting packages such as Quick Books do not provide job cost accounting. I have installed JAMIS, which is the 'Cadillac', DELTEK, which is the 'Fairlane 500', and SYMPAQ, which is the 'Volkswagen'. They are all expensive, even for single user licenses. You can go to these and other product sites on the web and examine their capabilities:

DELTEK

SYMPAQ

JAMIS

Here are some products especially designed for small business:

ICAT

PROCAS

ASPIRE

All of the above suppliers are used to long sales cycles and competing against each other. They will do remote demos for you and bend over backwards to show you their products. You can learn much about government contract job cost accounting just by taking the time to go through a demo. For companies whose direct job cost records are growing fast, these tools offer the utility to manage data volume and efficiently handle requirements such as changes to existing records driven by rate changes, fiscal period closing or contract closeout.

GROWING YOUR JOB COST SYSTEM

Many small companies doing government work start out with a rudimentary direct job cost accounting software package such as Peach Tree (now SAGE) or the add-on tool for Quick Books mentioned above and crutch it with manually maintained records on spreadsheets for indirect cost allocation, time keeping, expense reporting, purchasing and supplier commitments. There is nothing wrong with such an approach as long as you can supply job cost (individual contract) records complying with modified CAS Coverage and demonstrate such things as:

Time Cards and time keeping process by worker and labor category by contract or indirect cost pool

Expense Reports and expense report process by worker by contract or indirect cost pool

Purchase Orders with job cost accounting data traceable thru invoices to contacts or indirect cost pools after payment

Overhead Allocations in a Government-unique cost center to individual contracts at month end based on individual contract direct labor cost

G and A Allocations in a Government-unique cost center to individual contracts at month end based on individual contract total cost.

A semi-manual approach gets burdensome as the company grows and the number of accounting transactions at the direct and indirect cost level increase in volume.

If you do not have a good job cost software tool, I recommend you begin looking for one and plan strategically to implement it if  significant progress billings and service contracting transactions, to include time and material and cost plus contracts, are in your future. Implementing a government compliant job cost system is a sensitive matter and must be planned. '

As companies grow and get involved in larger programs they come under full CAS Coverage that requires a disclosure statement and considerably more controls on the structure of the business system. You can read about full CAS coverage at the link contained in the introduction to this article.

SUMMARY

If you have the investment budget available, you may wish to consider the job cost accounting system software suppliers I mentioned above and compete them against each other for a price. Installing one of these packages is critical from an accounting period standpoint. I recommend a new year starting point and running in parallel on your old system for at least a quarter.

Keep in mind that DCAA does not approve COTS job cost accounting system software. Buying the software will not make you "DCAA Compliant" or "CAS Compliant" You do that through careful process development, specific to your company, utilizing software as a tool to operate your own unique business processes. Your processes will include long range planning, pricing, job cost accounting, indirect cost allocation, time-keeping, expense reporting, purchasing and commitments and billing - all geared to accurate job cost records at the individual contract level.

To the extent that you cannot demonstrate the above features to DCAA when they audit your business you CAN demonstrate that you are aware of the necessity to set these things up, lay out your plan to do so, and specify a time frame within which DCAA can expect to see you complete your compliant government contract pricing and accounting structure.

I have found that DCAA auditors are reasonable people who understand small companies must grow into government business systems. Showing them your accounting structure and your business system plans will display knowledge they will appreciate and assure them you understand the requirements, even if you cannot demonstrate all the processes at the point in time that the government initially audits your company.

Chapters 45 and 51 through 53 of my Book, "Small Business Federal Government Contracting" provides further detail and examples on establishing CAS-Compliant small business planning, pricing and job cost accounting. The book is free as a download in the right margin of this site in the "Box Net" cube.

NOTE:  Comments at this post have been retained from previous discussions on the topic at "Small to feds" 

Business Ethics Feed Government Records of Past Performance

Previous discussions at this site have emphasized the importance of maintaining a solid past performance rating to meet award criteria used by every federal agency when granting small business contracts.

Your Past Performance Record

We have also highlighted the importance of maintaining solid ethical business practices in dealing with customers and industry partners.

Maintaining an Ethical Company Image

This article will discuss the practical aspects of achieving the above, the associated challenges and how not meeting them can jeopardize your industry reputation and business success.  

IGNORANCE ON POLICY AND REGULATORY MATTERS IS NOT AN EXCUSE

The small business faces a front-end-loaded and ongoing learning challenge in understanding the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), Unallowable Costs, Organization Conflict of Interest (OCI) many other similar policies the federal government invokes. 

A continuous learning process must include evaluating the impact of these requirements, developing consistent processes and systems to meet and maintain them or risk poor ratings on proposals, audits and performance; even the denial of an invoice payment.

In short, the government has the right to audit, examine and approve your internal operations for conformance to the law before granting a contract or paying a bill.  These are not preferences by contracting officers.  They are federal contracting laws.

The astute small business learns the law and incorporates compliance in its business practices.

CONTRACTING PERSONNEL IN ACQUISITION ROLES HAVE VARYING LEVELS OF KNOWLEDGE & PROFESSIONALISM

The US Government and its prime contractor cadre form a massive professional base.  Although they conduct training in policy and regulation to their acquisition professionals, these professionals are rotated frequently and/or encounter contracting authority as only one role among many in their principal professional endeavors.

Government Contracting Roles

Small business systems are unique to a company.  Documenting them and conveying their compliance to regulations in a clear, lucid way to auditors, agency buyers/contracting officers and other government customers is a vital part of avoiding misunderstandings regarding compliance issues.  

An additional concern with prime contractors is protecting intellectual and proprietary data, such as rates and factors, while participating in the assist audit process used by the government to avoid risk of undesirable disclosure from one firm to another.

If, during the course of marketing, proposing and negotiating government contracts with government and prime contractor personnel, a small business encounters lack of professionalism, misunderstanding of the regulations or defiance of them, the occurrence must be escalated to higher authority with tact, judgment and the long term objective of not only obtaining new business, but staying in business. 

Managing Government Teaming Relationships

DISCLOSURES ARE MANDATORY

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)  52.203-13 in 2008 made mandatory that contractors must disclose past, present or pending violations of contract law to the government.   Not adhering to this requirement can be costly in terms of poor past performance records, legal expenses and financial judgments.

FAR 52.203-13 (3) - Mandatory Disclosure

The Truth in Negotiations Act

TRAINING IN GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS IS A GOOD INVESTMENT

As fast as things move these days if we don't train and communicate effectively we are running very high risks.  The modern era in which we live demands that training be sophisticated, interactive and responsive to changing times. It should evolve out of core company processes and contain feedback mechanisms.

Some training will be global, such as policy, corporate ethics and human relations. Other training will be specialized, such as changes in law, company policy or technology by functional areas.

Principal among the topics at the head of the list for generic training in the art of something would be "Communicating Effectively" to employees to customers, to regulators; both orally and in writing.

Small Business Company Trainng

SUMMARY

Small business must evaluate regulations then communicate and enunciate a company ethics policy and processes that insure compliance with laws and regulations, training personnel on them in the process.

In doing so, disclosures will then be positive and the business will not become the subject of negative press releases by a government agency. (Examples below)


Portrait of a Crooked Government Contractor

Star Power And The Military Industrial Complex

Job Cost Accounting Basics For Small Business Government Service Contractors

Small enterprises in the start-up service contracting business to the federal government often experience DCAA audit difficulties, suspended billings or negative marks on pricing proposals for not having addressed job cost accounting and business system issues involving Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) requirements.  This article will address the basics of resolving those issues in a service contracting start-up environment.

"Small to Feds" has addressed the requirements of CAS and the associated business system design requirements previously in the following articles that are suggested for review as refreshers:

Establishing FAR and CAS Compliant Business

A Business System Framework

DCAA Audits and Small Business Job Cost Accounting

Provisional Indirect Rates

DEFINE YOUR COMPANY APPROACH AND ITS COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS 

Please view the below matters in the context of your business system design at the cost element and job description level:

You must consider the job cost accounting implications of the government contract environment; i.e how do the individual labor charges every day on time cards for the company employees and management get booked to the correct accounts or expense pools and do they or do they not become part of the labor distribution directly to contracts or indirectly though overhead and G&A applications at month end (in effect is the government billed for the cost?).

In most small start-ups the best way to handle this is to write job descriptions for every position, including the owners and executives as well as other employees. Each job description is declared chargeable as direct only, indirect only or in rare exceptions, both direct and indirect chargeable.

Job descriptions are also declared salaried or hourly, exempt and non-exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act,  which drives eligibility for time and one half for overtime.  All company personnel are furnished copies of job descriptions and informed of their direct or indirect, salaried or hourly status as a function of their employment offers. (You should generate retroactive offer letters for everyone in the company, have all personnel accept them in writing and put the letters and the job descriptions in the company personnel files for audit purposes)

Job descriptions are assigned to labor cost element codes in the job cost system (as opposed to other codes for materials, subcontract, travel and other direct costs that may require separate cost element codes to distinguish them for accounting purposes.

A direct charge job description will always have a contract charge number every day for every hour of work (typically technical performers) This usually drives the employee eligibility for overtime pay for hours in excess of 40. A company policy should be established early for this matter. Most companies pay straight time for hours in excess of 40 for salaried direct charge personnel.  Exceptions are hourly non-exempt personnel who must be paid time and one half under the law.

An indirect job description performer will charge every day on a time card to an overhead or G&A account and the associated labor cost will become part of expenses that are distributed at month end to all contracts, based on the direct labor dollar content of each contract for the accounting period (typically secretaries, administration personnel and the like charge to overhead and the owners and executives charge to G&A (unless an executive is working exclusively in an individual overhead cost center - that person would then charge the overhead charge number for that cost center or directly to a project if performing project-direct effort).

Exceptions to the above would be where a direct charge employee has no contract home and his labor must be charged somewhere. In that instance he would charge to a company overhead account or G&A account outside the overhead pool and his or her labor would not become part of the allocation to contracts, effectively making it come out of the company bottom line (profit). This situation normally drives layoffs or finding the person a contract home to charge.

Labor donated to the company as a form of loan must also be charged in the exceptions manner discussed above (loan labor liability account) and may not be charged or recovered via a contract bill to the government directly or as part of an overhead allocation. DCCA really goes looking for this type of thing.

Where an executive normally charging to an overhead or G&A pool, is a key person on a contract or performing direct effort on a contract for parts of his or her day, that person would charge the contract charge numbers for those efforts and the overhead or G&A accounts for company business of an indirect nature.

CHECKLIST
The above rules of the game (disclosure practices in DCAA parlance) normally force several business system tangibles.  It is suggested that you generate the following as a minimum in your startup preparations for demonstration during a proposal or fact finding audit:

1. Time Cards with a time card policy requiring they be filled out daily and turned in and approved by a supervisor weekly, then booked into the accounting system weekly.

2. Expense Reports bearing charge numbers for accounting as direct or indirect expenses.

3. Written Purchase orders to suppliers bearing charge numbers for accounting as direct or indirect purchases

4. Labor Job Descriptions - specially ear marked in the manner discussed above.

5. Cost element assignments for accounting purposes for 1-4, above.

6. Charge numbers for 1-4 above. A charge number is the combination of an employee number, supplier number, expense report number and a cost element, charged to a unique direct charge contract number, an overhead pool expense account or a G&A expense account.

7. Consider hiring a payroll service company  to support salaries and regular paychecks plus tax and withholding for EVERYONE IN THE COMPANY.

8. A monthly closing where direct costs are burdened with indirect costs and billings are generated to customers creating accounts receivable for that which can be billed and liabilities for that which cannot.

9. Revenue accounting upon receipt of a payment from a customer directly to the contract against which a bill was generated with offsetting receivable reductions at the contract level.

10. The discipline and attention to set up 1-9 and demonstrate its operation to a DCAA auditor.

Every successful small business in federal government service contracting has gone through the above; some proactively and others when they have had difficulties with a DCAA audit during a proposal or cannot get paid when they are under contact. The choice is yours.  It is not rocket science, it is different and it is a serious matter and must have your attention.

What Small Business Should Know About FAR And CAS

 

Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 

& 

Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) 

Rules Of The Game And Developing Your Game Plan

INTRODUCTION

Small businesses consistently encounter FAR and CAS requirements upon entering or growing into federal government contracting.   The purpose of these standards is to supply uniform regulatory guidance to all companies doing business with the government and to the agencies that buy from them. 

A  basic understanding of FAR and CAS is necessary to manage government contracts  as well as design business process approaches to meet the requirements.  

The FAR applies to the full acquisition cycle for all supplies and services the federal agencies buy. 

The CAS apply to consistency in estimating, pricing, job cost accounting, billing and closeout of financial data under the contracts for supplies and services regulated by the FAR. 

FAR and CAS are not "Rocket Science" but they are different than the commercial business sector.  

HOW TO DETERMINE WHAT FAR AND CAS MEAN TO YOU

No one ever reads the full body of FAR and CAS from cover to cover.  They are reference documents, maintained by the government to oversee the contracting process.  From time to time changes to the regulations are offered for public comment at the FAR web site. 

 Such changes are more common in the FAR than in CAS.  The CAS have been constant for several years and are not as dynamic as the detail processes in the FAR. 

The below table contains the principle FAR chapter titles and each of the 19 CAS clauses.  Linked below the table are the web sites that can be utilized to explore these documents. 

(Please Click Image To Enlarge)  

Federal Acquisition Regulation

Determine the regulation basics that apply to any given job considered for bidding.  Examine a few solicitations in your area of expertise at the SAM web site:

SAM Contract Opportunities

Glance through the terms and conditions of a given solicitation and note the FAR and CAS requirements sited.  Use the links to the FAR and CAS web sites as source documents to read in detail the clauses you must understand to effectively bid the job .  

Cost Accounting Standards

Small businesses are generally required to meet modified CAS coverage. Small businesses are generally required to meet modified CAS coverage.  The business system requirements for Modified Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) Coverage are defined by the government as follows: 

Standard 9904.401, Consistency in Estimating, Accumulating, and Reporting Costs

Standard 9904.402, Consistency in Allocating Costs Incurred for the Same Purpose

Standard 9904.405, Accounting for Unallowable Costs

Unallowable Cost Guidance

Standard 9904.406, Cost Accounting Standard―Cost Accounting Period

Modified, rather, than full, CAS coverage may be applied to a covered contract of less than $50 million awarded to a business unit that received less than $50 million in net CAS-covered awards in the immediately preceding cost accounting period.

The following article contains practical business system guidance regarding building a Modified CAS Coverage Small Business System for federal government contracting:

Managing Risk In Small Business Federal Government Contracting Business System Development

If you have confusion regarding interpreting a requirement, seek assistance in the table of contents to the free book at this site offering guidance under the topic in question

SUMMARY

While assessing the impact of FAR and CAS on your company educate yourself on that what directly affects your company first in making the transition to federal government contracting and growing into the field.

Carefully  maximize your existing business processes and systems first before making changes and do not jump to instant fixes with exotic software tools a supplier or consultant has told you will make you compliant or competitive overnight in government contracting. 

FAR and CAS are generally logical bodies of regulation that have come about due to the need to control and make consistent the government and industry approaches to meeting prudent and sound contracting objectives with the necessary  transparency to govern. 

FAR and CAS do not impose business systems.  They do require that you disclose the way you meet regulatory requirements in the way you operate with your processes and tools. Plan the approach and learn to convey it to auditors, contracting officers and industry partners.

Grow into the business by exploring the venue and having it grow into you.  

Managing Risk Under 'The Truth In Negotiations Act (TINA)'

THE RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH DEFECTIVE PRICING 

INTRODUCTION:

 
We have previously discussed at this site the development of credible cost and pricing data. That data is the product of not only estimating and pricing but also job cost accounting for managing contracts, business system design to meet Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) and the integrated aspects of the company business system demonstrating regulatory compliance:

Pricing With Credibility

Pricing Small Business Federal Government Contracts

Small Business Systems Development

DCAA Audits and Small Business Job Cost Systems

The purpose of this article is to cite the specifics of the “Truth in Negotiations Act” and recommend  management techniques to comply with this law and avoid defective pricing claims by the US Government. 

THE TRUTH IN NEGOTIATIONS ACT (TINA)

Public Law 87-653 (codified by 10 USC 2306a) was originally enacted in 1962 to place the Government on equal footing with the contractor during contract negotiations.  The following are the principal features of the law:

• Defines requirements for obtaining cost or pricing data

•  Requires certification that data are current, accurate, and complete

• Delineates exceptions to the requirement

• Addresses data submission for pricing of commercial items, below threshold contracts, and “other information”

•  Provides right of Government to examine contractor records

• Defines cost or pricing data

• Provides rules governing defective pricing

• Downward Contract price adjustment

• ·Recovery of overpayment (cost & profit) & interest (as of 1985)

• 2 M Threshold for contract actions (DOD recently increased from 750 K) Recent Procurement Reforms

• Contract actions include contracts, subcontracts, and modifications

•  TINA applicability is not affected by contract type

•   For subcontracts, the $2M threshold applies to the submission of data from the subcontractor to the prime contractor.

 
FIVE POINTS THE GOVERNMENT UTILIZES FOR ESTABLISHING DEFECTIVE PRICING

 
1)    The information in question fits the definition of cost or pricing data.

(2)    Accurate, complete, and current data existed and were reasonably available to the contractor before the agreement on price.

(3)    Accurate, complete, and current data were not submitted or disclosed to the contracting officer or one of the authorized representatives of the contracting officer and these individuals did not have actual knowledge of such data or its significance to the proposal.

(4)    The Government relied on the defective data in negotiating with the contractor.

(5)    The Government’s reliance on the defective data caused an increase in the contract price.

MANAGING THE RISK OF A DEFECTIVE PRICING CLAIM

 
A government auditor relates to TINA and defective pricing whether or not it is required contractually and uses the TINA provisions as a frame of reference in how he or she views trend analysis of your company. Even if you do not have the TINA requirement in your bid or your contract, be aware the auditor is forming his or her opinion of your compliance with the law against the TINA framework.

Post award audits can be ordered at any time by a PCO. During such audits your proposal is juxtaposed to your incurred cost and historical data on a given contract. During such juxtapositions, defective pricing stands out glaringly.  If you become aware of an anomaly, cover your tracks by immediately assessing the impact and deciding whether or not a disclosure should be made.  

Integrate your system from pricing to billing to close out utilizing a consistent cost structure template and be aware you are putting audit history in place and that historical trends are what auditors follow.
 

Keep all subsequent disclosures under proposals to the government well documented, serialized and current at the prime and subcontract level, reflecting them in a detail record of negotiation.  

If you have commenced work prior to final negotiations under a letter contract or similar interim arrangement, conduct a sweep of actual costs and commitments and reflect them in an updated proposal to the government prior to negotiation of a final price.  Reassess quotes, escalation factors, indirect costs and related factors in the same manner if a proposal expires and you are asked to extend your pricing. 

If substantive conditions in an open proposal estimate change, document them thoroughly and disclose them to the government based on an astute analysis of your risk if they can be misconstrued as defective pricing by an auditor.  Carefully convey the impact on the prospective contract and its pricing to the contracting officer if you decide to disclose. 

Consistency with CAS and your CAS disclosure statement as well as your latest negotiated forward pricing rates is mandatory. Any departure from these baselines will attract audit attention.
In many defective pricing instances what you knew and when you knew it becomes a factor.  Continually assess changing conditions that may dramatically impact your cost performance and manage them by taking corrective actions, developing workarounds and carefully communicating requirements to your subcontractors and suppliers. 

Remember under TINA you are required to perform cost/price analysis of your subcontractors if their work scope exceeds the $700k threshold. You must submit the results with your proposal to the government.  If a disclosure becomes necessary, make it sooner rather than later when the data may be under the cloud of a negative audit finding.

SUMMARY

 
Defective pricing actions by the government can have a severe impact on your past performance rating.  They must be cited by you with any new business proposal in which you are asked if your company has been accused or convicted of a violation of the law or has open or pending government adjudications regarding legal violations. 

Sculpt and educate your auditor, contracting officers and government analysts on the specifics of your company business system and preserve its integrity over the long run to maximize your win potential and lower the risk of defective pricing claims by the government. 

A good rule of thumb is to consider every proposal as if it were under TINA compliance whether or not you must submit a “Certificate of Current Cost and Pricing” under TINA.  This will keep your business system sharp, your ethics and standards high and your past performance record clean.